What is Wal-Mart?

As you all know that's become a famous quote from Paris Hilton.

"It's, like, they sell wall stuff?"

Nope. It's a huge playground.

If you haven't live in a rural town before, you won't realize how bored life could be. I still recall during my college days dating means visiting supermarket together.

Bloatware Marketing 101

Let's say company X invented a new format for video called FOO and ask you to download a FOO player from them to play these videos. When you download FOO player, you have to download BAR player, which has nothing to do with video but it sells other stuff for company X.

By this time you'll probably cry foul and start condemning M$.

Although it sounds like typical "evil" M$ tactics, it actually comes from the "angel" company: Apple.

This is what I found when I helped my dad to view QuickTime movies taken by his digital camera: if you download the free QuickTime player from Apple, it comes with iTunes as well. Both pieces of software are known to hog system resources on Windows. I certainly don't want any unnecessary software on my dad's computer. So, we have to go with something like QuickTime Alternative or VLC Media player from VideoLAN

What surprise me the most is not Apple's tactic but the few number of critics that condemn this. If this is from M$, you'll probably have heard of it a million times.

All these led me to thinking: the power of a cult is really scary. Although it has very few members, the members are exceptionally loyal and defend real hard for their faith. The masses cannot drown out their voice.

So, if your company doesn't have a cult, you won't get away with bloatware.

Side Note: I am also shopping for solution to protect/clean marking from keyboards on the screen of my iBook. I do not know of any manufacturer other than Apple that makes notebook that have keyboard marks on the screen yet I've never seen this criticized in reviews of Apple's notebooks. Talk about unfairness!

The bottom line is: when you're the darling of the media, you get a lot of breaks.

Why U2 sucks?

Here is why.

The part about those 2 DJs got fired certainly doesn't bode well for me as it showed they are just hypocrites. Not that I like U2 much to begin with. I guess artistic freedom other than theirs is not so important after all.

One port USB hub for $29

Last time I searched PriceGrabber, 4-port USB hubs are sold for $9-$20.

If I sell you a 1-port USB hub for $29, you're gonna scream "Ripoff!!!" right?

Well, I guess iPod Shuffle fans who bought their "dock" from Apple probably would think otherwise.

Side note: This is from a review of iPod Shuffle:
"the real story of the Shuffle is that it is designed to encourage you to approach your music differently than you would with other music players."

Man, is he for real? I think next time he visits a restaurant, they should sell him a piece of white bread for $10, that's designed to encourage him to approach food differently than he would with other restaurants.

Online Music Service (and when to ditch my iPod)

As a music lover and music maker, I constantly look for ways to listen to as much new music as possible (and legally so that the artists get paid!) Satellite radio certainly sounded exciting to me but my initial impression was so-so. While there are lots of free or paid radio available online, this article is about "music on demand," i.e., services that allow me to pick songs to listen to.

The most successful digital music store is, no question, Apple's iTunes Music store, but the fact that it restricts the purchased music only playable on iTunes and iPod does not bode well with me, not to mention $0.99 a song seems too expensive to me (see the side note at the end of this article) Even though I own an iPod, I don't want my purchased music to be tied to it.

Although its nature is very different to iTunes Music store, Real's Rhapsody is an indirect competitor IMO. All-you-can-listen-online costs $10 a month. Ideal for people glued to a PC 75% of the time when they are awake, like myself. Although "downloading" the songs (burn to CD then re-rip) is troublesome and costs you extra, technically speaking, you could digitally "record" the stream and thus get the songs free. That's a lot of work to "build a library" though. Their audio quality are praised over others like Napster and of course, XM satellite radio.

The new Napster-to-Go has make a splash in tech news because of its unique "renting music monthly" model. For $15 a month you could download as much as you want and listen to them as long as you continue paying the monthly fee. At a first glance it sounds totally counterintuitive to normal spending habit on music, i.e., paying a couple dozen $ to buy a few CDs per month and you own them for life and pay no more. However, if you think of it as a radio-like service (think Rhapsody), $15/month for unlimited rotations in your playlist chosen by yourself that you could bring with you anywhere you go is actually a pretty decent deal, especially for music addict like me. Their ad is kinda exaggerated but they do have a point. The downsides are: 1) Napster's selection is not that great compared to others according to some 2) their software works with Win XP only so my Win2K and Mac OS X machines are out of luck. 3) if you are taking your portable device out on a trip that lasted more than a month without sync-ing to your PC, your playlist is nothing more than a lengthy dead silence. Nevertheless, this model is in the right direction for digital music IMO. I'll check it out once I ditched my iPod.

On a side note: I found it interesting that Apple removed the claim that iTunes is "fair to the artists" from their website after people like those from Downhill Battle has pointed out artists were treated just as unfairly as CD sales "despite huge new efficiencies created by internet distribution --no CDs to make, no distributors to store and ship them, no CD stores to build and run"

The other side of the Tsunami slur story

After reading a couple of articles from US media about a New York radio station (WQHT) being condemned for a show that made fun of the tsunami victims with lyrics like "You can hear God laughing, 'Swim you bitches swim," I was thinking that was mean and poor taste but wasn't supposed to be such a big deal, was it?

Well, I've changed my mind completely after reading more from "alternative media" like Hong Kong newspaper. Here is the full text (mind you it's full of racial slur)

What puzzled me the most now is why the mainstream media didn't mention the rest of the lyric. That would fully justify the outrage against that show. The only reason I could think of is this is an act of mainstream media covering each other up. After all they are in the same business. Who cares about what Chinese wants to know in US?

(More ironically, "We're the World" is the song Hong Kong showbiz group chosen to cover as its theme song for the tsunami fund raising concert. I criticized them for not writing their own song way back. )

Update: here is a comment about mainstream media's initial refusal to even air the story at all.

Now they have sided with the devil

Looks like the conservatives are getting a bit lost. Christian groups have called for the Supreme Court to crack down on file sharing, basically taking the same side as their archenemy -- Hollywood.

Well, let me be generous by helping them here: Christian groups should have supported the file sharers instead. Simply let file sharers bring down Hollywood, the ultimate source of evil content! When you fight organized crimes, you always need to shut down the source. Then you won't have any porn, any violent video available.

Wait a minute, shutting down Hollywood is probably not enough. They need to ask their beloved president to bring back US troops so there won't be violent footages from the news on war anymore. And finally, ban Ms. Hilton from filming herself.

The conservatives lost, again?

They wanna outlaw all interesting TV programs like those episodes from Friends and Simpsons but failed! Can you believe conservative groups lost another fight (see this for details of the previous round) in the States?

CP/M: Nostalgia strikes!

Writing about the early days of Apple computer in the previous article certainly brought back a lot of good old memory: playing with Z80 card, 80 Col card, and CP/M!

So I did a search on CP/M and found this really interesting article: Windows-NT vs. CP/M

Back to 1976: Bring your own display and keyboard

That's a familiar slogan, right?

Yes, that's the "punch line" for the new 2005 Mac Mini.

Oh wait a minute! Doesn't that also applicable to the Apple's very first computer: Apple I?

I always believe the brightest people keep reinventing themselves. Well, maybe sometimes they simply need to copy themselves.

Round 1: Evil (a.k.a. Liberals) 1 - Jesusland 0

Bad news for the religious folks in Atlanta: they can't re-emphasize that evolution is a theory, not a fact.

I thought we all knew that already, don't we?

BTW, I don't recall we evil liberals ever requesting a "Christian is a religion, not a fact" sticker on all Bibles.

They could tell so much from a name

Please check out this notice sent by the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) alleging a company of copyright infringement because of having a file called X-Files1.21b, which is open-source TCL code! (Not X-Files Season 1-7 as those morons were thinking!)

This is so ridiculous to a point that it's actually kinda funny. Beware of how you name your files otherwise MPAA will come knocking on your doors.

(Basically this is similar to what RIAA did to Professor Usher's now famous mp3 file)

Too sensitive?

Just watched "The Da Vinci Code Deception" on PBS. This program is backed by Christian organization aiming at separating facts from fiction in this vastly popular book. They claimed this book is no challenge to the religion since it's a fiction and people are not suppose to learn religious fact out of a fiction.

My question is: if that's the case, why bother making a program to dispute it?

iDiot or simply having too much money?

This article is not about what I don't like about the new iPod shuffle, namely, it's nothing innovative but a "re-colored" design of screen-less MP3 players from a couple of years ago. (I bought one such player for $60 in 2002. And yes, I did wish it had a display when I want to know the name of the song I was listening to. Anyway, I'll leave criticism to their competitors.)

This article is about the comments I read about this player: several people mentioned US$99 (or $149 for the 1Gb version) as "impulse buy." I used to think only $2 candy bar or bag of chips near supermarket cashiers qualify as impulse buy. Man, people in the States are rich! Or too brainwashed by consumerism?

(Can't believe I am writing 2 Apple related articles in a row!
Disclosure statement: I'm neither an Apple lover or basher. I own an iBook and an iPod, bought at heavily discounted price. It does pretty much what I expected for the price I paid, but that's pretty much the only good thing I'd say about them.)

From ass kicking to ass kissing

U2 claimed Apple has "single-handedly saved the music industry."

Considered they have partnered with Apple for the U2 edition of iPod, I don't see how I could view the above endorsement as unbiased.

I'd give some credits to Apple's effort in coming up with a simple method/interface to sell music online. (Well, they were not the first company that sell music online. And the way they restrict how the music sold could be played, i.e., DRM-ed and support iPod only, do deserve some blame) In any case, if they have indeed "saved" the music industry, the major record companies won't be crying and whining everyday about sales going downhill.

(Disclosure statement: I'm neither a U2 lover or hater. I do agree "New Years Day" and "With or Without You" are great songs but that's pretty much all I care about them.)

For those who think a name is just a name

The baseball team formerly known as Anaheim Angels have offically been renamed to Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim

Doesn't it sound too desperate for them to lure fans from LA?

Well, I have been wondering why the football teams who play in New Jersey name themselves New York Giants and New York Jets for a long time.

However, the most ridiculous name of all gotta be Golden State Warriors. Where the heck is Golden State anyway?

X'mas in Vegas

Madeline got her caricature "potrait" drawn there. Please check out my article in Chinese.

Don't forget to click the link at the end of the article for more pictures! (No need to signup Ofoto. Just click the purple "View Photos" button on the linked page)

Spreading the disease

Poisonous formula (milk powder)
fake egg,
dyed orange...

What's next biggest export from China?

It's SPAM!

I feel bad reading all these being a Chinese myself.

A costly miss by the censorship "sensors"?

Music fans know that Wal-Mart censors music it sells. It's not supposed to sell any music with explicit lyric. This is a practice heavily criticized by more open-minded music fans, including myself.

Well, apparently their "effort" is not enough: a couple bought Evanescence's latest CD from Wal-Mart for their daughter and was not happy to hear 'fuck' in the lyrics so they sue Wal-Mart 'coz Wal-Mart is supposed to censor such thing. See Wal-Mart Sued Over Evanescence CD Lyrics for more details.

So, what an irony! Wal-Mart's censorship practice backfired. If they don't do it in the first place, I guess they can't get sued.

(BTW, I never claim that my blog is free of foul language. So don't even think about suing me for that!)

A day to remember: no more IBM PC

(from eweek.com)

BTW, there has been numerous analysis on this deal, with most saying IBM is getting out of PC business because it's not profitable, but this is the most interesting one: The China Syndrome: If You Want to Understand IBM Selling Its PC Division, Just Look East